Demographics details for College place, WA vs Shepherd, MT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in College place, WA vs Shepherd, MT.

Data College place Shepherd
Population 9,804 772
Median Age 32.2 years 40.5 years
Median Income $60,417 $125,179
Married Families 37.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 2.5

Population Comparison: College place vs Shepherd

  • In College place, the population is higher at 9,804, compared to 772 in Shepherd.
  • The median age in Shepherd is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 32.2 years in College place.
  • Shepherd has a higher median income of $125,179, compared to $60,417 in College place.
  • In Shepherd, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 37.0% in College place.
  • College place has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Shepherd.
  • The unemployment rate in College place is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.5% in Shepherd.

Demographics

Demographics College place vs Shepherd provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic College place Shepherd
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 72 86
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 18 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating 14

Demographics Comparison: College place vs Shepherd

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both College place and Shepherd at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Shepherd at 86% compared to 72% in College place.
  • The Asian population is larger in College place at 2% compared to 0% in Shepherd.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in College place at 18% compared to 0% in Shepherd.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in College place at 8% compared to 0% in Shepherd.
  • In Shepherd, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 0% in College place.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric College place Shepherd
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 11.2%
Depression 26.6% 28.0%
Smoking 12.8% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 23.7%
Obesity 32.7% 33.2%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: College place vs Shepherd

  • More residents in College place report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.7% in Shepherd.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shepherd at 28.0% versus 26.6% in College place.
  • Shepherd has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 12.8% in College place.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Shepherd at 23.7% compared to 17.6% in College place.
  • Shepherd has higher obesity rates at 33.2% compared to 32.7% in College place.
  • Disability percentages are higher in College place at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Shepherd.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level College place Shepherd
No Schooling 0.1% (14) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 8.6% (847) 16.2% (125)
Less than High School 13.2% (1,295) 8.0% (62)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.7% (2,224) 17.9% (138)

Education Levels Comparison: College place vs Shepherd

  • A higher percentage of residents in College place have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Shepherd.
  • In Shepherd, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 8.6% in College place.
  • More residents in College place have less than a high school education at 13.2% compared to 8.0% in Shepherd.
  • A higher percentage of residents in College place hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 17.9% in Shepherd.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.