Demographics details for College park, MD vs Luna pier, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in College park, MD vs Luna pier, MI.
| Data | College park | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,190 | 1,367 |
| Median Age | 21.6 years | 52.1 years |
| Median Income | $76,973 | $48,073 |
| Married Families | 17.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: College park vs Luna pier
- In College park, the population is higher at 34,190, compared to 1,367 in Luna pier.
- The median age in Luna pier is higher at 52.1 years, compared to 21.6 years in College park.
- College park has a higher median income of $76,973 compared to $48,073 in Luna pier.
- In Luna pier, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 17.0% in College park.
- College park has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Luna pier.
- The unemployment rate in College park is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.2% in Luna pier.
Demographics
Demographics College park vs Luna pier provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | College park | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 1 |
| White | 39 | 92 |
| Asian | 14 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: College park vs Luna pier
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in College park at 23% compared to 1% in Luna pier.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Luna pier at 92% compared to 39% in College park.
- The Asian population is larger in College park at 14% compared to 1% in Luna pier.
- The Hispanic community is larger in College park at 17% compared to 1% in Luna pier.
- More residents identify as two or more races in College park at 7% compared to 5% in Luna pier.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both College park and Luna pier at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | College park | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 15.4% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 42.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: College park vs Luna pier
- In Luna pier, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.8% in College park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Luna pier at 25.5% versus 15.4% in College park.
- Luna pier has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 12.4% in College park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Luna pier at 18.4% compared to 12.8% in College park.
- Luna pier has higher obesity rates at 42.5% compared to 36.4% in College park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Luna pier at 15.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | College park | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (657) | 0.7% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 6.4% (2,199) | 20.4% (279) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (3,210) | 7.5% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (6,769) | 12.7% (174) |
Education Levels Comparison: College park vs Luna pier
- A higher percentage of residents in College park have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.7% in Luna pier.
- In Luna pier, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 6.4% in College park.
- More residents in College park have less than a high school education at 9.4% compared to 7.5% in Luna pier.
- A higher percentage of residents in College park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 12.7% in Luna pier.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.