Demographics details for College park, MD vs Chesnee, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in College park, MD vs Chesnee, SC.
| Data | College park | Chesnee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,190 | 878 |
| Median Age | 21.6 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $76,973 | $42,727 |
| Married Families | 17.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: College park vs Chesnee
- In College park, the population is higher at 34,190, compared to 878 in Chesnee.
- The median age in Chesnee is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 21.6 years in College park.
- College park has a higher median income of $76,973 compared to $42,727 in Chesnee.
- In Chesnee, the percentage of married families is higher at 20.0%, compared to 17.0% in College park.
- The poverty level is identical in both College park and Chesnee at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in College park is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.2% in Chesnee.
Demographics
Demographics College park vs Chesnee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | College park | Chesnee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 11 |
| White | 39 | 85 |
| Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: College park vs Chesnee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in College park at 23% compared to 11% in Chesnee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chesnee at 85% compared to 39% in College park.
- The Asian population is larger in College park at 14% compared to 0% in Chesnee.
- The Hispanic community is larger in College park at 17% compared to 3% in Chesnee.
- More residents identify as two or more races in College park at 7% compared to 1% in Chesnee.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both College park and Chesnee at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | College park | Chesnee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 21.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 15.4% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: College park vs Chesnee
- In Chesnee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.4% compared to 14.8% in College park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chesnee at 26.3% versus 15.4% in College park.
- Chesnee has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 12.4% in College park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chesnee at 14.3% compared to 12.8% in College park.
- Chesnee has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 36.4% in College park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chesnee at 18.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | College park | Chesnee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (657) | 0.7% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 6.4% (2,199) | 14.0% (123) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (3,210) | 14.9% (131) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (6,769) | 8.0% (70) |
Education Levels Comparison: College park vs Chesnee
- A higher percentage of residents in College park have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.7% in Chesnee.
- In Chesnee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 6.4% in College park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chesnee at 14.9%, compared to 9.4% in College park.
- A higher percentage of residents in College park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 8.0% in Chesnee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.