Demographics details for Coleman, OK vs Warrensburg, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coleman, OK vs Warrensburg, MO.
| Data | Coleman | Warrensburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 297 | 19,458 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 24.4 years |
| Median Income | $45,938 | $54,535 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Coleman vs Warrensburg
- The population in Warrensburg is higher at 19,458, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- Residents in Coleman have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 24.4 years in Warrensburg.
- Warrensburg has a higher median income of $54,535, compared to $45,938 in Coleman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Coleman at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Warrensburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Warrensburg at 14%, compared to 12% in Coleman.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Coleman and Warrensburg at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Coleman vs Warrensburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coleman | Warrensburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 77 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
| American Indian | 11 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coleman vs Warrensburg
- In Warrensburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Coleman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Warrensburg at 80% compared to 77% in Coleman.
- In Warrensburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Coleman.
- Warrensburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Coleman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coleman at 9% compared to 7% in Warrensburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coleman at 11% compared to 0% in Warrensburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coleman | Warrensburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 26.9% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 29.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coleman vs Warrensburg
- More residents in Coleman report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.4% in Warrensburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Coleman at 26.9% compared to 24.3% in Warrensburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coleman at 22.9% compared to 20.8% in Warrensburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Warrensburg at 16.8% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coleman at 40.8% compared to 37.2% in Warrensburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 11.0% in Warrensburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coleman | Warrensburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 28.6% (85) | 9.7% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (12) | 6.0% (1,174) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (33) | 18.4% (3,573) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coleman vs Warrensburg
- In Warrensburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Coleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coleman hold a high school diploma at 28.6% compared to 9.7% in Warrensburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Warrensburg at 6.0%, compared to 4.0% in Coleman.
- In Warrensburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 11.1% in Coleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.