Demographics details for Coleman, OK vs Scottsdale, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coleman, OK vs Scottsdale, AZ.
Data | Coleman | Scottsdale |
---|---|---|
Population | 297 | 243,050 |
Median Age | 39.7 years | 48.4 years |
Median Income | $45,938 | $104,197 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Coleman vs Scottsdale
- The population in Scottsdale is higher at 243,050, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- The median age in Scottsdale is higher at 48.4 years, compared to 39.7 years in Coleman.
- Scottsdale has a higher median income of $104,197, compared to $45,938 in Coleman.
- In Scottsdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Coleman.
- Coleman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Scottsdale.
- The unemployment rate in Coleman is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.9% in Scottsdale.
Demographics
Demographics Coleman vs Scottsdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Coleman | Scottsdale |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 2 |
White | 77 | 75 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 1 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
American Indian | 11 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Coleman vs Scottsdale
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Coleman and Scottsdale at 2%.
- Coleman has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 75% in Scottsdale.
- In Scottsdale, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Coleman.
- Scottsdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 1% in Coleman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coleman at 9% compared to 7% in Scottsdale.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coleman at 11% compared to 1% in Scottsdale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Coleman | Scottsdale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 8.0% |
Depression | 26.9% | 19.1% |
Smoking | 22.9% | 10.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 40.8% | 26.5% |
Disability Percentage | 29.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coleman vs Scottsdale
- More residents in Coleman report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 14.7% in Scottsdale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Coleman at 26.9% compared to 19.1% in Scottsdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coleman at 22.9% compared to 10.2% in Scottsdale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Scottsdale at 19.3% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coleman at 40.8% compared to 26.5% in Scottsdale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 9.0% in Scottsdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Coleman | Scottsdale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (1,157) |
High School Diploma | 28.6% (85) | 7.7% (18,770) |
Less than High School | 4.0% (12) | 4.0% (9,724) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (33) | 47.7% (116,035) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coleman vs Scottsdale
- In Scottsdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Coleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coleman hold a high school diploma at 28.6% compared to 7.7% in Scottsdale.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 4.0%.
- In Scottsdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.7% compared to 11.1% in Coleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.