Demographics details for Coleman, OK vs Ashville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coleman, OK vs Ashville, OH.
| Data | Coleman | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 297 | 4,689 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $45,938 | $60,293 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Coleman vs Ashville
- The population in Ashville is higher at 4,689, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- Residents in Coleman have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 35.1 years in Ashville.
- Ashville has a higher median income of $60,293, compared to $45,938 in Coleman.
- In Ashville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Coleman.
- Coleman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Ashville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Coleman and Ashville at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Coleman vs Ashville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coleman | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 77 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | 11 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coleman vs Ashville
- In Ashville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Coleman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashville at 91% compared to 77% in Coleman.
- Both Coleman and Ashville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ashville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Coleman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coleman at 9% compared to 2% in Ashville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coleman at 11% compared to 0% in Ashville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coleman | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 26.9% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 29.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coleman vs Ashville
- More residents in Coleman report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.6% in Ashville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Coleman at 26.9% compared to 24.6% in Ashville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coleman at 22.9% compared to 20.6% in Ashville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ashville at 18.7% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
- Ashville has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 40.8% in Coleman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 19.0% in Ashville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coleman | Ashville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.6% (85) | 25.7% (1,206) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (12) | 10.2% (476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (33) | 8.4% (392) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coleman vs Ashville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Coleman and Ashville at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coleman hold a high school diploma at 28.6% compared to 25.7% in Ashville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashville at 10.2%, compared to 4.0% in Coleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coleman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.4% in Ashville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.