Demographics details for Cole camp, MO vs Hartford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cole camp, MO vs Hartford, CT.
Data | Cole camp | Hartford |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,149 | 120,686 |
Median Age | 47.2 years | 33.1 years |
Median Income | $40,192 | $41,841 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 19.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Cole camp vs Hartford
- The population in Hartford is higher at 120,686, compared to 1,149 in Cole camp.
- Residents in Cole camp have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 33.1 years in Hartford.
- Hartford has a higher median income of $41,841, compared to $40,192 in Cole camp.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cole camp at 48.0% compared to 19.0% in Hartford.
- The poverty level is higher in Hartford at 20%, compared to 12% in Cole camp.
- Hartford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Cole camp.
Demographics
Demographics Cole camp vs Hartford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cole camp | Hartford |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 36 |
White | 100 | 2 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 46 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cole camp vs Hartford
- In Hartford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- Cole camp has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 2% in Hartford.
- In Hartford, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cole camp.
- Hartford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hartford at 13%, compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- In Hartford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cole camp.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cole camp | Hartford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 14.7% |
Depression | 24.7% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 20.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 12.1% |
Obesity | 42.4% | 43.3% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cole camp vs Hartford
- In Hartford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.0% in Cole camp.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cole camp at 24.7% compared to 22.6% in Hartford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cole camp at 22.4% compared to 20.2% in Hartford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cole camp at 16.6% compared to 12.1% in Hartford.
- Hartford has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 42.4% in Cole camp.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cole camp at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Hartford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cole camp | Hartford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (5) | 2.9% (3,500) |
High School Diploma | 31.4% (361) | 17.4% (21,002) |
Less than High School | 10.6% (122) | 27.9% (33,618) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (166) | 11.0% (13,316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cole camp vs Hartford
- In Hartford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.4% in Cole camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cole camp hold a high school diploma at 31.4% compared to 17.4% in Hartford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hartford at 27.9%, compared to 10.6% in Cole camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cole camp hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 11.0% in Hartford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.