Demographics details for Colby, WI vs Taylorsville, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Colby, WI vs Taylorsville, KY.
| Data | Colby | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,928 | 1,292 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $51,176 | $45,060 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Colby vs Taylorsville
- In Colby, the population is higher at 1,928, compared to 1,292 in Taylorsville.
- Residents in Colby have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 31.5 years in Taylorsville.
- Colby has a higher median income of $51,176 compared to $45,060 in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 30.0% in Colby.
- Colby has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The unemployment rate in Colby is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Colby vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Colby | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 61 | 75 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Colby vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Colby.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylorsville at 75% compared to 61% in Colby.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Colby.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Colby at 27% compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Colby at 12% compared to 11% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Colby and Taylorsville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Colby | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.9% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Colby vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.0% in Colby.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.6% versus 23.0% in Colby.
- Taylorsville has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 18.9% in Colby.
- Binge drinking is more common in Colby at 23.9% compared to 15.6% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 37.0% in Colby.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Colby.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Colby | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.3% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 32.7% (631) | 22.1% (285) |
| Less than High School | 23.3% (449) | 22.1% (285) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (203) | 8.4% (108) |
Education Levels Comparison: Colby vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Colby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Colby hold a high school diploma at 32.7% compared to 22.1% in Taylorsville.
- More residents in Colby have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 22.1% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Colby hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 8.4% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.