Demographics details for Colbert, OK vs Sugar grove, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Colbert, OK vs Sugar grove, PA.
| Data | Colbert | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,074 | 546 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 42.2 years |
| Median Income | $53,600 | $68,056 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Colbert vs Sugar grove
- In Colbert, the population is higher at 1,074, compared to 546 in Sugar grove.
- Residents in Colbert have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 42.2 years in Sugar grove.
- Sugar grove has a higher median income of $68,056, compared to $53,600 in Colbert.
- In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 44.0% in Colbert.
- Colbert has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Sugar grove.
- Sugar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Colbert.
Demographics
Demographics Colbert vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Colbert | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 1 |
| White | 66 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 14 |
| American Indian | 10 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Colbert vs Sugar grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Colbert at 12% compared to 1% in Sugar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar grove at 79% compared to 66% in Colbert.
- Both Colbert and Sugar grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Sugar grove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Colbert.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sugar grove at 14%, compared to 8% in Colbert.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Colbert at 10% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Colbert | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 43.2% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Colbert vs Sugar grove
- More residents in Colbert report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.3% in Sugar grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Colbert at 25.5% compared to 23.5% in Sugar grove.
- Sugar grove has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 21.6% in Colbert.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar grove at 18.2% compared to 14.3% in Colbert.
- Obesity rates are higher in Colbert at 43.2% compared to 38.8% in Sugar grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Colbert at 26.0% compared to 10.0% in Sugar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Colbert | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (5) | 1.5% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 33.7% (362) | 28.2% (154) |
| Less than High School | 31.4% (337) | 6.2% (34) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (180) | 13.0% (71) |
Education Levels Comparison: Colbert vs Sugar grove
- In Sugar grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Colbert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Colbert hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 28.2% in Sugar grove.
- More residents in Colbert have less than a high school education at 31.4% compared to 6.2% in Sugar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Colbert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 13.0% in Sugar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.