Demographics details for Cody, NE vs Taylorsville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cody, NE vs Taylorsville, GA.
| Data | Cody | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 167 | 258 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 56.7 years |
| Median Income | $48,750 | $41,250 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cody vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 258, compared to 167 in Cody.
- The median age in Taylorsville is higher at 56.7 years, compared to 38.9 years in Cody.
- Cody has a higher median income of $48,750 compared to $41,250 in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 53.0% in Cody.
- Cody has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Cody.
Demographics
Demographics Cody vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cody | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 88 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cody vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Cody.
- Cody has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 82% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Cody.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Cody.
- Both Cody and Taylorsville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cody at 5% compared to 0% in Taylorsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cody | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cody vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Cody.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 24.1% versus 17.6% in Cody.
- Taylorsville has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Cody.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cody at 20.4% compared to 17.0% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cody at 37.8% compared to 32.5% in Taylorsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 25.0% in Cody.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cody | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (2) | 0.8% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 28.1% (47) | 24.8% (64) |
| Less than High School | 10.8% (18) | 51.2% (132) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (29) | 22.5% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cody vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of residents in Cody have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cody hold a high school diploma at 28.1% compared to 24.8% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 51.2%, compared to 10.8% in Cody.
- In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 17.4% in Cody.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.