Demographics details for Coconut creek, FL vs Woodland, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coconut creek, FL vs Woodland, CA.
| Data | Coconut creek | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,348 | 61,462 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $72,740 | $84,494 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Coconut creek vs Woodland
- The population in Woodland is higher at 61,462, compared to 57,348 in Coconut creek.
- Residents in Coconut creek have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 37.0 years in Woodland.
- Woodland has a higher median income of $84,494, compared to $72,740 in Coconut creek.
- In Woodland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 37.0% in Coconut creek.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodland at 12%, compared to 10% in Coconut creek.
- Woodland has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.2% in Coconut creek.
Demographics
Demographics Coconut creek vs Woodland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coconut creek | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 2 |
| White | 39 | 21 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Woodland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coconut creek at 15% compared to 2% in Woodland.
- Coconut creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 39% compared to 21% in Woodland.
- In Woodland, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Coconut creek.
- Woodland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 27% in Coconut creek.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodland at 20%, compared to 16% in Coconut creek.
- In Woodland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Coconut creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coconut creek | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 12.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 27.5% | 28.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Woodland
- In Woodland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.4% in Coconut creek.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodland at 18.8% versus 17.8% in Coconut creek.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coconut creek at 16.2% compared to 12.2% in Woodland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodland at 16.4% compared to 15.6% in Coconut creek.
- Woodland has higher obesity rates at 28.9% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodland at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Coconut creek.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coconut creek | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (831) | 2.0% (1,223) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (9,506) | 13.9% (8,533) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (5,111) | 22.2% (13,649) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.5% (15,196) | 19.0% (11,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coconut creek vs Woodland
- In Woodland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.4% in Coconut creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 13.9% in Woodland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodland at 22.2%, compared to 8.9% in Coconut creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 19.0% in Woodland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.