Demographics details for Coconut creek, FL vs Taylor, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coconut creek, FL vs Taylor, MI.
| Data | Coconut creek | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,348 | 62,258 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $72,740 | $59,352 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Coconut creek vs Taylor
- The population in Taylor is higher at 62,258, compared to 57,348 in Coconut creek.
- Residents in Coconut creek have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 37.9 years in Taylor.
- Coconut creek has a higher median income of $72,740 compared to $59,352 in Taylor.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Coconut creek at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Taylor.
- The poverty level is higher in Taylor at 12%, compared to 10% in Coconut creek.
- Taylor has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.2% in Coconut creek.
Demographics
Demographics Coconut creek vs Taylor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coconut creek | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 21 |
| White | 39 | 63 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Taylor
- In Taylor, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 15% in Coconut creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylor at 63% compared to 39% in Coconut creek.
- The Asian population is larger in Coconut creek at 3% compared to 1% in Taylor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coconut creek at 27% compared to 8% in Taylor.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coconut creek at 16% compared to 7% in Taylor.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Coconut creek and Taylor at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coconut creek | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 23.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 27.5% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Taylor
- In Taylor, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.4% in Coconut creek.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylor at 25.0% versus 17.8% in Coconut creek.
- Taylor has a higher smoking rate at 23.8% compared to 16.2% in Coconut creek.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Taylor at 18.0% compared to 15.6% in Coconut creek.
- Taylor has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylor at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Coconut creek.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coconut creek | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (831) | 1.0% (629) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (9,506) | 22.8% (14,189) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (5,111) | 17.2% (10,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.5% (15,196) | 10.6% (6,622) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coconut creek vs Taylor
- A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Taylor.
- In Taylor, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 16.6% in Coconut creek.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylor at 17.2%, compared to 8.9% in Coconut creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 10.6% in Taylor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.