Demographics details for Coconut creek, FL vs Fort valley, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Coconut creek, FL vs Fort valley, GA.

Data Coconut creek Fort valley
Population 57,348 8,838
Median Age 42.4 years 30.6 years
Median Income $72,740 $31,807
Married Families 37.0% 18.0%
Poverty Level 10% 25%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Coconut creek vs Fort valley

  • In Coconut creek, the population is higher at 57,348, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
  • Residents in Coconut creek have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
  • Coconut creek has a higher median income of $72,740 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Coconut creek at 37.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 10% in Coconut creek.
  • Fort valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Coconut creek.

Demographics

Demographics Coconut creek vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Coconut creek Fort valley
Black 15 70
White 39 18
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 27 8
Two or More Races 16 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 15% in Coconut creek.
  • Coconut creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 39% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Coconut creek at 3% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Coconut creek at 27% compared to 8% in Fort valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Coconut creek at 16% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Coconut creek and Fort valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Coconut creek Fort valley
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 15.5%
Depression 17.8% 19.5%
Smoking 16.2% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 11.8%
Obesity 27.5% 46.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.4% in Coconut creek.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort valley at 19.5% versus 17.8% in Coconut creek.
  • Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 16.2% in Coconut creek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Coconut creek at 15.6% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Coconut creek.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Coconut creek Fort valley
No Schooling 1.4% (831) 3.0% (267)
High School Diploma 16.6% (9,506) 13.9% (1,226)
Less than High School 8.9% (5,111) 17.3% (1,527)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.5% (15,196) 10.8% (954)

Education Levels Comparison: Coconut creek vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.4% in Coconut creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 8.9% in Coconut creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.