Demographics details for Coconut creek, FL vs Forest lake, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Coconut creek, FL vs Forest lake, MN.

Data Coconut creek Forest lake
Population 57,348 20,857
Median Age 42.4 years 37.9 years
Median Income $72,740 $91,157
Married Families 37.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Coconut creek vs Forest lake

  • In Coconut creek, the population is higher at 57,348, compared to 20,857 in Forest lake.
  • Residents in Coconut creek have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
  • Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $72,740 in Coconut creek.
  • In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Coconut creek.
  • Coconut creek has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Coconut creek and Forest lake at 3.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Coconut creek vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Coconut creek Forest lake
Black 15 3
White 39 81
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 27 6
Two or More Races 16 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Forest lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coconut creek at 15% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 39% in Coconut creek.
  • In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Coconut creek.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Coconut creek at 27% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Coconut creek at 16% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Coconut creek and Forest lake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Coconut creek Forest lake
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 8.8%
Depression 17.8% 24.1%
Smoking 16.2% 15.7%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 21.4%
Obesity 27.5% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Forest lake

  • More residents in Coconut creek report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Forest lake at 24.1% versus 17.8% in Coconut creek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Coconut creek at 16.2% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 15.6% in Coconut creek.
  • Forest lake has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Coconut creek at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Coconut creek Forest lake
No Schooling 1.4% (831) 0.5% (101)
High School Diploma 16.6% (9,506) 14.6% (3,055)
Less than High School 8.9% (5,111) 7.7% (1,615)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.5% (15,196) 24.6% (5,123)

Education Levels Comparison: Coconut creek vs Forest lake

  • A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
  • More residents in Coconut creek have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 24.6% in Forest lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.