Demographics details for Coconut creek, FL vs Farson, WY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coconut creek, FL vs Farson, WY.
| Data | Coconut creek | Farson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,348 | 217 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 44.5 years |
| Median Income | $72,740 | $42,721 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Coconut creek vs Farson
- In Coconut creek, the population is higher at 57,348, compared to 217 in Farson.
- The median age in Farson is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 42.4 years in Coconut creek.
- Coconut creek has a higher median income of $72,740 compared to $42,721 in Farson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Coconut creek at 37.0% compared to 19.0% in Farson.
- The poverty level is identical in both Coconut creek and Farson at 10%.
- Farson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Coconut creek.
Demographics
Demographics Coconut creek vs Farson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coconut creek | Farson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | Data is updating |
| White | 39 | 100 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 16 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Farson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coconut creek at 15% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farson at 100% compared to 39% in Coconut creek.
- The Asian population is larger in Coconut creek at 3% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coconut creek at 27% compared to 0% in Farson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coconut creek at 16% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Coconut creek and Farson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coconut creek | Farson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 27.5% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Farson
- In Farson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.4% in Coconut creek.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farson at 20.3% versus 17.8% in Coconut creek.
- Farson has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 16.2% in Coconut creek.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farson at 19.0% compared to 15.6% in Coconut creek.
- Farson has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farson at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Coconut creek.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coconut creek | Farson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (831) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (9,506) | 13.8% (30) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (5,111) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.5% (15,196) | 16.1% (35) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coconut creek vs Farson
- A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Farson.
- More residents in Coconut creek have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 16.1% in Farson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.