Demographics details for Coconut creek, FL vs Clarksville, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Coconut creek, FL vs Clarksville, TN.

Data Coconut creek Clarksville
Population 57,348 176,974
Median Age 42.4 years 30.1 years
Median Income $72,740 $62,688
Married Families 37.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.3

Population Comparison: Coconut creek vs Clarksville

  • The population in Clarksville is higher at 176,974, compared to 57,348 in Coconut creek.
  • Residents in Coconut creek have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
  • Coconut creek has a higher median income of $72,740 compared to $62,688 in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Coconut creek at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 12%, compared to 10% in Coconut creek.
  • Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.2% in Coconut creek.

Demographics

Demographics Coconut creek vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Coconut creek Clarksville
Black 15 22
White 39 55
Asian 3 3
Hispanic 27 11
Two or More Races 16 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 15% in Coconut creek.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarksville at 55% compared to 39% in Coconut creek.
  • Both Coconut creek and Clarksville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Coconut creek at 27% compared to 11% in Clarksville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Coconut creek at 16% compared to 9% in Clarksville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Coconut creek and Clarksville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Coconut creek Clarksville
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 12.6%
Depression 17.8% 28.4%
Smoking 16.2% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 14.8%
Obesity 27.5% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Coconut creek vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.4% in Coconut creek.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 28.4% versus 17.8% in Coconut creek.
  • Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 16.2% in Coconut creek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Coconut creek at 15.6% compared to 14.8% in Clarksville.
  • Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Coconut creek.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Coconut creek Clarksville
No Schooling 1.4% (831) 0.6% (976)
High School Diploma 16.6% (9,506) 13.7% (24,180)
Less than High School 8.9% (5,111) 5.5% (9,720)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.5% (15,196) 16.7% (29,557)

Education Levels Comparison: Coconut creek vs Clarksville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 13.7% in Clarksville.
  • More residents in Coconut creek have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 5.5% in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Coconut creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 16.7% in Clarksville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.