Environment details: Cocoa beach FL
water quality is excellent, highly suitable for use.
Environment details: Rutherford NJ
water quality is decent, requires attention to pollutants.
Compare Environment: Cocoa beach FL vs Rutherford NJ
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Cocoa beach | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1811 | 713 |
| Water Quality | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is excellent, highly suitable for use. | water quality is decent, requires attention to pollutants. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 2.01 | 2.02 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 94 | 85 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Cocoa beach vs Rutherford
- Water quality is rated higher in Cocoa beach at 8/10 compared to 5/10 in Rutherford.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Rutherford with an average index of 2.02 compared to 2.01 in Cocoa beach.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Cocoa beach at 94 compared to 85 in Rutherford.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.