Demographics details for Cochranville, PA vs Pleasant hill, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cochranville, PA vs Pleasant hill, MO.

Data Cochranville Pleasant hill
Population 488 8,715
Median Age 49.6 years 36.9 years
Median Income $92,292 $88,408
Married Families 50.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Cochranville vs Pleasant hill

  • The population in Pleasant hill is higher at 8,715, compared to 488 in Cochranville.
  • Residents in Cochranville have a higher median age of 49.6 years compared to 36.9 years in Pleasant hill.
  • Cochranville has a higher median income of $92,292 compared to $88,408 in Pleasant hill.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cochranville at 50.0% compared to 43.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • The poverty level is higher in Pleasant hill at 8%, compared to 5% in Cochranville.
  • The unemployment rate in Cochranville is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Pleasant hill.

Demographics

Demographics Cochranville vs Pleasant hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cochranville Pleasant hill
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 90 91
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 6 6
Two or More Races 4 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cochranville vs Pleasant hill

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cochranville and Pleasant hill at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasant hill at 91% compared to 90% in Cochranville.
  • Both Cochranville and Pleasant hill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Cochranville and Pleasant hill at 6%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cochranville at 4% compared to 3% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cochranville and Pleasant hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cochranville Pleasant hill
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 12.9%
Depression 24.1% 25.7%
Smoking 19.8% 22.4%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 16.7%
Obesity 35.6% 39.8%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cochranville vs Pleasant hill

  • In Pleasant hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.1% in Cochranville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pleasant hill at 25.7% versus 24.1% in Cochranville.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 19.8% in Cochranville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cochranville at 17.5% compared to 16.7% in Pleasant hill.
  • Pleasant hill has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 35.6% in Cochranville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pleasant hill at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Cochranville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cochranville Pleasant hill
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (46)
High School Diploma 24.4% (119) 19.3% (1,682)
Less than High School 15.6% (76) 5.9% (517)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.7% (67) 16.9% (1,475)

Education Levels Comparison: Cochranville vs Pleasant hill

  • In Pleasant hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Cochranville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cochranville hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 19.3% in Pleasant hill.
  • More residents in Cochranville have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 5.9% in Pleasant hill.
  • In Pleasant hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 13.7% in Cochranville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.