Demographics details for Cochranville, PA vs Hoyt, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cochranville, PA vs Hoyt, KS.
Data | Cochranville | Hoyt |
---|---|---|
Population | 488 | 589 |
Median Age | 49.6 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $92,292 | $73,750 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 56.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cochranville vs Hoyt
- The population in Hoyt is higher at 589, compared to 488 in Cochranville.
- Residents in Cochranville have a higher median age of 49.6 years compared to 40.0 years in Hoyt.
- Cochranville has a higher median income of $92,292 compared to $73,750 in Hoyt.
- In Hoyt, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 50.0% in Cochranville.
- The poverty level is higher in Hoyt at 7%, compared to 5% in Cochranville.
- The unemployment rate in Cochranville is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Hoyt.
Demographics
Demographics Cochranville vs Hoyt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cochranville | Hoyt |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 90 | 86 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Cochranville vs Hoyt
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cochranville and Hoyt at 0%.
- Cochranville has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 86% in Hoyt.
- In Hoyt, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Cochranville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cochranville at 6% compared to 5% in Hoyt.
- Both Cochranville and Hoyt have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- In Hoyt, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Cochranville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cochranville | Hoyt |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 9.8% |
Depression | 24.1% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 19.8% | 17.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 35.6% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cochranville vs Hoyt
- More residents in Cochranville report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.8% in Hoyt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cochranville at 24.1% compared to 22.2% in Hoyt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cochranville at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Hoyt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hoyt at 19.0% compared to 17.5% in Cochranville.
- Hoyt has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 35.6% in Cochranville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hoyt at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Cochranville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cochranville | Hoyt |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (3) |
High School Diploma | 24.4% (119) | 26.1% (154) |
Less than High School | 15.6% (76) | 12.6% (74) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (67) | 17.0% (100) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cochranville vs Hoyt
- In Hoyt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Cochranville.
- In Hoyt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 24.4% in Cochranville.
- More residents in Cochranville have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 12.6% in Hoyt.
- In Hoyt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 13.7% in Cochranville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.