Demographics details for Cochranville, PA vs Azusa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cochranville, PA vs Azusa, CA.
| Data | Cochranville | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 488 | 48,824 |
| Median Age | 49.6 years | 32.8 years |
| Median Income | $92,292 | $81,516 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Cochranville vs Azusa
- The population in Azusa is higher at 48,824, compared to 488 in Cochranville.
- Residents in Cochranville have a higher median age of 49.6 years compared to 32.8 years in Azusa.
- Cochranville has a higher median income of $92,292 compared to $81,516 in Azusa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cochranville at 50.0% compared to 32.0% in Azusa.
- The poverty level is higher in Azusa at 12%, compared to 5% in Cochranville.
- Azusa has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.0% in Cochranville.
Demographics
Demographics Cochranville vs Azusa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cochranville | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 90 | -6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 66 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cochranville vs Azusa
- In Azusa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
- Cochranville has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to -6% in Azusa.
- In Azusa, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Cochranville.
- Azusa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 6% in Cochranville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Azusa at 20%, compared to 4% in Cochranville.
- In Azusa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cochranville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cochranville | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 30.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cochranville vs Azusa
- More residents in Cochranville report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.6% in Azusa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cochranville at 24.1% compared to 15.9% in Azusa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cochranville at 19.8% compared to 11.0% in Azusa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cochranville at 17.5% compared to 15.1% in Azusa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cochranville at 35.6% compared to 30.3% in Azusa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Azusa at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Cochranville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cochranville | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.5% (1,200) |
| High School Diploma | 24.4% (119) | 14.2% (6,920) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (76) | 25.2% (12,281) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (67) | 17.2% (8,417) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cochranville vs Azusa
- In Azusa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Cochranville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cochranville hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 14.2% in Azusa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Azusa at 25.2%, compared to 15.6% in Cochranville.
- In Azusa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 13.7% in Cochranville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.