Demographics details for Cochran, GA vs Port charlotte, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cochran, GA vs Port charlotte, FL.
Data | Cochran | Port charlotte |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,647 | 63,913 |
Median Age | 28.9 years | 55.6 years |
Median Income | $31,326 | $58,799 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cochran vs Port charlotte
- The population in Port charlotte is higher at 63,913, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- The median age in Port charlotte is higher at 55.6 years, compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Port charlotte has a higher median income of $58,799, compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- In Port charlotte, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 11% in Port charlotte.
- Port charlotte has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Cochran vs Port charlotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cochran | Port charlotte |
---|---|---|
Black | 53 | 7 |
White | 40 | 71 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cochran vs Port charlotte
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cochran at 53% compared to 7% in Port charlotte.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port charlotte at 71% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- Both Cochran and Port charlotte have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Port charlotte has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port charlotte at 8%, compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cochran and Port charlotte at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cochran | Port charlotte |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 11.9% |
Depression | 21.8% | 20.7% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 22.0% |
Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cochran vs Port charlotte
- More residents in Cochran report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.2% in Port charlotte.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cochran at 21.8% compared to 20.7% in Port charlotte.
- Port charlotte has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 20.0% in Cochran.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port charlotte at 16.6% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cochran at 38.5% compared to 31.0% in Port charlotte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port charlotte at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in Cochran.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cochran | Port charlotte |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (54) | 1.4% (901) |
High School Diploma | 12.2% (569) | 24.2% (15,437) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (703) | 14.7% (9,408) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (592) | 16.0% (10,215) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cochran vs Port charlotte
- In Port charlotte, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Cochran.
- In Port charlotte, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.2% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- More residents in Cochran have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 14.7% in Port charlotte.
- In Port charlotte, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.