Demographics details for Cochran, GA vs Kenansville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cochran, GA vs Kenansville, NC.
| Data | Cochran | Kenansville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,647 | 759 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 48.4 years |
| Median Income | $31,326 | $53,750 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cochran vs Kenansville
- In Cochran, the population is higher at 4,647, compared to 759 in Kenansville.
- The median age in Kenansville is higher at 48.4 years, compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Kenansville has a higher median income of $53,750, compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- In Kenansville, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in Kenansville.
- Kenansville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Cochran vs Kenansville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cochran | Kenansville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | 20 |
| White | 40 | 61 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cochran vs Kenansville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cochran at 53% compared to 20% in Kenansville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kenansville at 61% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- In Kenansville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Cochran.
- Kenansville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kenansville at 6%, compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cochran and Kenansville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cochran | Kenansville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cochran vs Kenansville
- In Kenansville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.3% in Cochran.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kenansville at 24.3% versus 21.8% in Cochran.
- Kenansville has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.0% in Cochran.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kenansville at 15.6% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Kenansville has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 38.5% in Cochran.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kenansville at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Cochran.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cochran | Kenansville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (54) | 1.6% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (569) | 24.0% (182) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (703) | 13.8% (105) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (592) | 22.5% (171) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cochran vs Kenansville
- In Kenansville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.2% in Cochran.
- In Kenansville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- More residents in Cochran have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 13.8% in Kenansville.
- In Kenansville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.