Demographics details for Cochran, GA vs Harrisonburg, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cochran, GA vs Harrisonburg, VA.
Data | Cochran | Harrisonburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,647 | 51,158 |
Median Age | 28.9 years | 25.4 years |
Median Income | $31,326 | $56,050 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cochran vs Harrisonburg
- The population in Harrisonburg is higher at 51,158, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- Residents in Cochran have a higher median age of 28.9 years compared to 25.4 years in Harrisonburg.
- Harrisonburg has a higher median income of $56,050, compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Cochran and Harrisonburg at 25.0%.
- Cochran has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 18% in Harrisonburg.
- Harrisonburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Cochran vs Harrisonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cochran | Harrisonburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 53 | 8 |
White | 40 | 56 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 2 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cochran vs Harrisonburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cochran at 53% compared to 8% in Harrisonburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harrisonburg at 56% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- In Harrisonburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Cochran.
- Harrisonburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harrisonburg at 12%, compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cochran and Harrisonburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cochran | Harrisonburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.6% |
Depression | 21.8% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 17.8% |
Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cochran vs Harrisonburg
- More residents in Cochran report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.1% in Harrisonburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harrisonburg at 25.0% versus 21.8% in Cochran.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cochran at 20.0% compared to 17.8% in Harrisonburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harrisonburg at 16.1% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cochran at 38.5% compared to 36.5% in Harrisonburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Harrisonburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cochran | Harrisonburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (54) | 1.5% (768) |
High School Diploma | 12.2% (569) | 11.1% (5,653) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (703) | 15.9% (8,118) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (592) | 18.1% (9,247) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cochran vs Harrisonburg
- In Harrisonburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.2% in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cochran hold a high school diploma at 12.2% compared to 11.1% in Harrisonburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harrisonburg at 15.9%, compared to 15.1% in Cochran.
- In Harrisonburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.