Demographics details for Cochran, GA vs Franklin park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cochran, GA vs Franklin park, IL.
| Data | Cochran | Franklin park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,647 | 18,059 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $31,326 | $74,167 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Cochran vs Franklin park
- The population in Franklin park is higher at 18,059, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- The median age in Franklin park is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Franklin park has a higher median income of $74,167, compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- In Franklin park, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 9% in Franklin park.
- Franklin park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Cochran vs Franklin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cochran | Franklin park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | 1 |
| White | 40 | 10 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 59 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 23 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cochran vs Franklin park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cochran at 53% compared to 1% in Franklin park.
- Cochran has a higher percentage of White residents at 40% compared to 10% in Franklin park.
- In Franklin park, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Cochran.
- Franklin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Franklin park at 23%, compared to 3% in Cochran.
- In Franklin park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Cochran.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cochran | Franklin park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 30.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cochran vs Franklin park
- More residents in Cochran report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.2% in Franklin park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cochran at 21.8% compared to 17.7% in Franklin park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cochran at 20.0% compared to 14.4% in Franklin park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Franklin park at 18.9% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cochran at 38.5% compared to 30.9% in Franklin park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Franklin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cochran | Franklin park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (54) | 2.5% (453) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (569) | 17.0% (3,067) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (703) | 30.2% (5,452) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (592) | 12.7% (2,297) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cochran vs Franklin park
- In Franklin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.2% in Cochran.
- In Franklin park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Franklin park at 30.2%, compared to 15.1% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Cochran and Franklin park at 12.7%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.