Demographics details for Cochran, GA vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cochran, GA vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Cochran | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,647 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $31,326 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Cochran vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- The median age in Fontana is higher at 32.6 years, compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- In Fontana, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 13% in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Cochran vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cochran | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | 8 |
| White | 40 | 2 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cochran vs Fontana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cochran at 53% compared to 8% in Fontana.
- Cochran has a higher percentage of White residents at 40% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Cochran.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 3% in Cochran.
- In Fontana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cochran.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cochran | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cochran vs Fontana
- More residents in Cochran report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cochran at 21.8% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cochran at 20.0% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fontana at 15.1% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Fontana has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 38.5% in Cochran.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cochran | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (54) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (569) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (703) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (592) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cochran vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.2% in Cochran.
- In Fontana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 15.1% in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cochran hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.