Demographics details for Cochran, GA vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cochran, GA vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Cochran | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,647 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $31,326 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Cochran vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 32.6 years, compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Cochran vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cochran | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | 22 |
| White | 40 | 59 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cochran vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cochran at 53% compared to 22% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 59% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- The Asian population is larger in Cochran at 2% compared to 1% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cochran and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cochran | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cochran vs Clayton
- More residents in Cochran report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 21.8% in Cochran.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cochran at 20.0% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 38.5% in Cochran.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cochran | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (54) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (569) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (703) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (592) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cochran vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Cochran have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- More residents in Cochran have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.