Demographics details for Cochran, GA vs Bradenton, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cochran, GA vs Bradenton, FL.
| Data | Cochran | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,647 | 56,961 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $31,326 | $55,795 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Cochran vs Bradenton
- The population in Bradenton is higher at 56,961, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- The median age in Bradenton is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Bradenton has a higher median income of $55,795, compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- In Bradenton, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 12% in Bradenton.
- Bradenton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Cochran vs Bradenton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cochran | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | 14 |
| White | 40 | 54 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cochran vs Bradenton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cochran at 53% compared to 14% in Bradenton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bradenton at 54% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- Both Cochran and Bradenton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Bradenton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bradenton at 8%, compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cochran and Bradenton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cochran | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cochran vs Bradenton
- More residents in Cochran report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.8% in Bradenton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cochran at 21.8% compared to 20.1% in Bradenton.
- Bradenton has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 20.0% in Cochran.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bradenton at 15.3% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cochran at 38.5% compared to 33.2% in Bradenton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Bradenton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cochran | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (54) | 0.9% (506) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (569) | 19.3% (10,990) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (703) | 15.2% (8,653) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (592) | 19.3% (10,990) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cochran vs Bradenton
- A higher percentage of residents in Cochran have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Bradenton.
- In Bradenton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bradenton at 15.2%, compared to 15.1% in Cochran.
- In Bradenton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.