Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs Tullahoma, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs Tullahoma, TN.
Data | Coalinga | Tullahoma |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,024 | 20,830 |
Median Age | 35.0 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $68,976 | $56,771 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs Tullahoma
- The population in Tullahoma is higher at 20,830, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- The median age in Tullahoma is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976 compared to $56,771 in Tullahoma.
- In Tullahoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Tullahoma.
- The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.5% in Tullahoma.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs Tullahoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Coalinga | Tullahoma |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 6 |
White | 9 | 83 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 65 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 4 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tullahoma at 83% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- Both Coalinga and Tullahoma have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 5% in Tullahoma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 4% in Tullahoma.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 0% in Tullahoma.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Coalinga | Tullahoma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 19.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 14.0% |
Depression | 16.4% | 28.9% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 22.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 39.1% | 39.1% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tullahoma at 28.9% versus 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Tullahoma has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 15.1% in Tullahoma.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 39.1%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tullahoma at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Coalinga | Tullahoma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 0.6% (117) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 18.9% (3,932) |
Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 14.1% (2,944) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 19.3% (4,012) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs Tullahoma
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.6% in Tullahoma.
- In Tullahoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 14.1% in Tullahoma.
- In Tullahoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.