Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs Scandia, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs Scandia, KS.
| Data | Coalinga | Scandia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,024 | 338 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 48.6 years |
| Median Income | $68,976 | $49,219 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs Scandia
- In Coalinga, the population is higher at 17,024, compared to 338 in Scandia.
- The median age in Scandia is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976 compared to $49,219 in Scandia.
- In Scandia, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is identical in both Coalinga and Scandia at 15%.
- The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.4% in Scandia.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs Scandia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coalinga | Scandia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 9 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 65 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs Scandia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coalinga at 4% compared to 1% in Scandia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Scandia at 90% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in Coalinga at 2% compared to 0% in Scandia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 0% in Scandia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 9% in Scandia.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 0% in Scandia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coalinga | Scandia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 16.4% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 20.3% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs Scandia
- More residents in Coalinga report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.7% in Scandia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Scandia at 20.9% versus 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coalinga at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Scandia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Scandia at 20.3% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coalinga at 39.1% compared to 37.5% in Scandia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scandia at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coalinga | Scandia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 14.5% (49) |
| Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 10.7% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 18.6% (63) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs Scandia
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Scandia.
- In Scandia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 10.7% in Scandia.
- In Scandia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.