Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs San luis, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs San luis, AZ.
| Data | Coalinga | San luis |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,024 | 35,770 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 31.6 years |
| Median Income | $68,976 | $46,747 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 24.3 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs San luis
- The population in San luis is higher at 35,770, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Coalinga have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 31.6 years in San luis.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976 compared to $46,747 in San luis.
- In San luis, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in San luis at 18%, compared to 15% in Coalinga.
- San luis has a higher unemployment rate at 24.3% compared to 6.5% in Coalinga.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs San luis provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coalinga | San luis |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 9 | -39 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 65 | 93 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 44 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs San luis
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coalinga at 4% compared to 1% in San luis.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of White residents at 9% compared to -39% in San luis.
- The Asian population is larger in Coalinga at 2% compared to 0% in San luis.
- San luis has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 93%, compared to 65% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San luis at 44%, compared to 18% in Coalinga.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 1% in San luis.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coalinga | San luis |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 18.0% |
| Depression | 16.4% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 18.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 45.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs San luis
- In San luis, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in San luis at 19.0% versus 16.4% in Coalinga.
- San luis has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 14.6% in San luis.
- San luis has higher obesity rates at 45.5% compared to 39.1% in Coalinga.
- Disability percentages are higher in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in San luis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coalinga | San luis |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 3.3% (1,167) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 9.6% (3,430) |
| Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 54.3% (19,437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 5.1% (1,836) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs San luis
- In San luis, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 3.2% in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 9.6% in San luis.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San luis at 54.3%, compared to 39.2% in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.1% compared to 5.1% in San luis.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.