Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs Rogersville, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs Rogersville, TN.
| Data | Coalinga | Rogersville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,024 | 4,630 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 41.8 years |
| Median Income | $68,976 | $45,797 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs Rogersville
- In Coalinga, the population is higher at 17,024, compared to 4,630 in Rogersville.
- The median age in Rogersville is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976 compared to $45,797 in Rogersville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Coalinga and Rogersville at 31.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Coalinga and Rogersville at 15%.
- The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 4.2% in Rogersville.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs Rogersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coalinga | Rogersville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 9 | 94 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 65 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 2 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs Rogersville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coalinga at 4% compared to 3% in Rogersville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rogersville at 94% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in Coalinga at 2% compared to 1% in Rogersville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 0% in Rogersville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 2% in Rogersville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 0% in Rogersville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coalinga | Rogersville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 16.4% | 30.2% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 25.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs Rogersville
- In Rogersville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rogersville at 30.2% versus 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Rogersville has a higher smoking rate at 25.6% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 15.1% in Rogersville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coalinga at 39.1% compared to 38.2% in Rogersville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rogersville at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coalinga | Rogersville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 1.7% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 27.9% (1,290) |
| Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 19.5% (904) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 13.7% (632) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs Rogersville
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.7% in Rogersville.
- In Rogersville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 19.5% in Rogersville.
- In Rogersville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.