Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs New windsor, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs New windsor, NY.

Data Coalinga New windsor
Population 17,024 27,664
Median Age 35.0 years 41.0 years
Median Income $68,976 $80,000
Married Families 31.0% 62.1%
Poverty Level 15% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 6.5 3.1

Population Comparison: Coalinga vs New windsor

  • The population in New windsor is higher at 27,664, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
  • The median age in New windsor is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
  • New windsor has a higher median income of $80,000, compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
  • In New windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.1%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
  • Coalinga has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in New windsor.
  • The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.1% in New windsor.

Demographics

Demographics Coalinga vs New windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Coalinga New windsor
Black 4 5
White 9 80
Asian 2 5
Hispanic 65 10
Two or More Races 18 Data is updating
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs New windsor

  • In New windsor, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in New windsor at 80% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
  • In New windsor, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Coalinga.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 10% in New windsor.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 0% in New windsor.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 0% in New windsor.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Coalinga New windsor
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.9% Data is updating%
Depression 16.4% Data is updating%
Smoking 17.2% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 39.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 13.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs New windsor

  • More residents in Coalinga report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Coalinga at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Coalinga at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Coalinga at 39.1% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Coalinga New windsor
No Schooling 3.2% (537) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.8% (2,349) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 39.2% (6,672) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.1% (1,380) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs New windsor

  • A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.1% compared to 0.0% in New windsor.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.