Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs Minden, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs Minden, NV.
| Data | Coalinga | Minden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,024 | 3,140 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 51.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,976 | $87,778 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs Minden
- In Coalinga, the population is higher at 17,024, compared to 3,140 in Minden.
- The median age in Minden is higher at 51.0 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Minden has a higher median income of $87,778, compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- In Minden, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Minden.
- The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 4.1% in Minden.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs Minden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coalinga | Minden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 9 | 84 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 65 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 6 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs Minden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coalinga at 4% compared to 0% in Minden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Minden at 84% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- Both Coalinga and Minden have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 8% in Minden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 6% in Minden.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 0% in Minden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coalinga | Minden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 16.4% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs Minden
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Coalinga and Minden at 16.9%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Minden at 21.0% versus 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coalinga at 17.2% compared to 13.7% in Minden.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Minden at 17.8% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coalinga at 39.1% compared to 28.2% in Minden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Minden at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coalinga | Minden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 17.0% (534) |
| Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 1.6% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 28.0% (879) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs Minden
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Minden.
- In Minden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 1.6% in Minden.
- In Minden, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.0% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.