Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs Hohenwald, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs Hohenwald, TN.
Data | Coalinga | Hohenwald |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,024 | 3,849 |
Median Age | 35.0 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $68,976 | $36,523 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs Hohenwald
- In Coalinga, the population is higher at 17,024, compared to 3,849 in Hohenwald.
- The median age in Hohenwald is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976 compared to $36,523 in Hohenwald.
- In Hohenwald, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Hohenwald at 16%, compared to 15% in Coalinga.
- The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 5.2% in Hohenwald.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs Hohenwald provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Coalinga | Hohenwald |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 9 | 93 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 65 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 3 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs Hohenwald
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coalinga at 4% compared to 0% in Hohenwald.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hohenwald at 93% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- Both Coalinga and Hohenwald have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 2% in Hohenwald.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 3% in Hohenwald.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 0% in Hohenwald.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Coalinga | Hohenwald |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 21.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 15.4% |
Depression | 16.4% | 30.5% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 26.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 39.1% | 37.3% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs Hohenwald
- In Hohenwald, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hohenwald at 30.5% versus 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Hohenwald has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 14.9% in Hohenwald.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coalinga at 39.1% compared to 37.3% in Hohenwald.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hohenwald at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Coalinga | Hohenwald |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 0.7% (26) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 22.2% (856) |
Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 18.5% (713) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 7.0% (268) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs Hohenwald
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.7% in Hohenwald.
- In Hohenwald, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 18.5% in Hohenwald.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.1% compared to 7.0% in Hohenwald.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.