Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs Henderson, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs Henderson, NV.
| Data | Coalinga | Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,024 | 331,415 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $68,976 | $85,311 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs Henderson
- The population in Henderson is higher at 331,415, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- The median age in Henderson is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Henderson has a higher median income of $85,311, compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- In Henderson, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Henderson.
- The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 5.9% in Henderson.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs Henderson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coalinga | Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 6 |
| White | 9 | 56 |
| Asian | 2 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 65 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 10 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs Henderson
- In Henderson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Henderson at 56% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Henderson, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Coalinga.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 18% in Henderson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 10% in Henderson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 1% in Henderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coalinga | Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 16.4% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs Henderson
- In Henderson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Henderson at 19.5% versus 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coalinga at 17.2% compared to 14.7% in Henderson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 14.7% in Henderson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coalinga at 39.1% compared to 28.6% in Henderson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Henderson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coalinga | Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 0.7% (2,336) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 14.1% (46,801) |
| Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 8.1% (26,764) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 24.6% (81,415) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs Henderson
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.7% in Henderson.
- In Henderson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 8.1% in Henderson.
- In Henderson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.