Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs Gillette, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs Gillette, NJ.
| Data | Coalinga | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,024 | 3,251 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,976 | $145,000 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs Gillette
- In Coalinga, the population is higher at 17,024, compared to 3,251 in Gillette.
- The median age in Gillette is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Gillette has a higher median income of $145,000, compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- In Gillette, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 2% in Gillette.
- The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.0% in Gillette.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs Gillette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coalinga | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 9 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 65 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs Gillette
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coalinga at 4% compared to 1% in Gillette.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gillette at 90% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Gillette, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Coalinga.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 2% in Gillette.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 3% in Gillette.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Coalinga at 2% compared to 0% in Gillette.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coalinga | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs Gillette
- More residents in Coalinga report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Depression is more prevalent in Coalinga at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Coalinga at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Binge drinking is more common in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Obesity rates are higher in Coalinga at 39.1% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Disability percentages are higher in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coalinga | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs Gillette
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.1% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.