Demographics details for Coalinga, CA vs Casa grande, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coalinga, CA vs Casa grande, AZ.
| Data | Coalinga | Casa grande |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,024 | 60,032 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $68,976 | $64,535 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Coalinga vs Casa grande
- The population in Casa grande is higher at 60,032, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- The median age in Casa grande is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976 compared to $64,535 in Casa grande.
- In Casa grande, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Casa grande.
- The unemployment rate in Coalinga is higher at 6.5%, compared to 4.4% in Casa grande.
Demographics
Demographics Coalinga vs Casa grande provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coalinga | Casa grande |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 9 | 35 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 65 | 41 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 16 |
| American Indian | 2 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Coalinga vs Casa grande
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coalinga at 4% compared to 3% in Casa grande.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Casa grande at 35% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- Both Coalinga and Casa grande have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coalinga at 65% compared to 41% in Casa grande.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coalinga at 18% compared to 16% in Casa grande.
- In Casa grande, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 2% in Coalinga.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coalinga | Casa grande |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 16.4% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coalinga vs Casa grande
- In Casa grande, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Casa grande at 20.0% versus 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Casa grande has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Casa grande at 16.9% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Casa grande has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 39.1% in Coalinga.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Casa grande at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coalinga | Casa grande |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (537) | 0.8% (479) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (2,349) | 15.5% (9,311) |
| Less than High School | 39.2% (6,672) | 12.7% (7,601) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (1,380) | 12.5% (7,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coalinga vs Casa grande
- A higher percentage of residents in Coalinga have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.8% in Casa grande.
- In Casa grande, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- More residents in Coalinga have less than a high school education at 39.2% compared to 12.7% in Casa grande.
- In Casa grande, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.