Demographics details for Clyde, OH vs Waxahachie, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clyde, OH vs Waxahachie, TX.
Data | Clyde | Waxahachie |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,318 | 45,476 |
Median Age | 49.0 years | 31.9 years |
Median Income | $55,956 | $80,044 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Clyde vs Waxahachie
- The population in Waxahachie is higher at 45,476, compared to 6,318 in Clyde.
- Residents in Clyde have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 31.9 years in Waxahachie.
- Waxahachie has a higher median income of $80,044, compared to $55,956 in Clyde.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clyde at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Waxahachie.
- Clyde has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Waxahachie.
- Waxahachie has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.5% in Clyde.
Demographics
Demographics Clyde vs Waxahachie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clyde | Waxahachie |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 16 |
White | 89 | 53 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 22 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clyde vs Waxahachie
- In Waxahachie, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 1% in Clyde.
- Clyde has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 53% in Waxahachie.
- In Waxahachie, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Clyde.
- Waxahachie has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 6% in Clyde.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waxahachie at 8%, compared to 3% in Clyde.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clyde at 1% compared to 0% in Waxahachie.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clyde | Waxahachie |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.5% |
Depression | 22.9% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 21.8% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 18.7% |
Obesity | 41.8% | 38.1% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clyde vs Waxahachie
- More residents in Clyde report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Waxahachie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waxahachie at 23.5% versus 22.9% in Clyde.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clyde at 21.8% compared to 16.8% in Waxahachie.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Clyde and Waxahachie at 18.7%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clyde at 41.8% compared to 38.1% in Waxahachie.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clyde at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Waxahachie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clyde | Waxahachie |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (30) | 1.8% (823) |
High School Diploma | 23.4% (1,481) | 12.6% (5,721) |
Less than High School | 11.2% (708) | 10.3% (4,683) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.3% (965) | 15.7% (7,149) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clyde vs Waxahachie
- In Waxahachie, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.5% in Clyde.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clyde hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 12.6% in Waxahachie.
- More residents in Clyde have less than a high school education at 11.2% compared to 10.3% in Waxahachie.
- In Waxahachie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 15.3% in Clyde.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.