Demographics details for Clyde, OH vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clyde, OH vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Clyde | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,318 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 49.0 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $55,956 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clyde vs Picayune
- The population in Picayune is higher at 11,826, compared to 6,318 in Clyde.
- Residents in Clyde have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Clyde has a higher median income of $55,956 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clyde at 40.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 10% in Clyde.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clyde and Picayune at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clyde vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clyde | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 38 |
| White | 89 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clyde vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Clyde.
- Clyde has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- Both Clyde and Picayune have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clyde at 6% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Picayune at 5%, compared to 3% in Clyde.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clyde at 1% compared to 0% in Picayune.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clyde | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clyde vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.6% in Clyde.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Picayune at 24.0% versus 22.9% in Clyde.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 21.8% in Clyde.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clyde at 18.7% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 41.8% in Clyde.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clyde and Picayune at 21.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clyde | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (30) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (1,481) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 11.2% (708) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.3% (965) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clyde vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Clyde.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clyde hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Picayune at 11.8%, compared to 11.2% in Clyde.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clyde hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.3% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.