Demographics details for Clyde, OH vs Bellingham, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clyde, OH vs Bellingham, WA.
| Data | Clyde | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,318 | 93,896 |
| Median Age | 49.0 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $55,956 | $64,026 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clyde vs Bellingham
- The population in Bellingham is higher at 93,896, compared to 6,318 in Clyde.
- Residents in Clyde have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher median income of $64,026, compared to $55,956 in Clyde.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clyde at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Bellingham.
- The poverty level is higher in Bellingham at 11%, compared to 10% in Clyde.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clyde and Bellingham at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clyde vs Bellingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clyde | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 89 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clyde vs Bellingham
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Clyde and Bellingham at 1%.
- Clyde has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 74% in Bellingham.
- In Bellingham, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Clyde.
- Bellingham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 6% in Clyde.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bellingham at 8%, compared to 3% in Clyde.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clyde and Bellingham at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clyde | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 30.0% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 25.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clyde vs Bellingham
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Clyde and Bellingham at 17.6%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bellingham at 30.0% versus 22.9% in Clyde.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clyde at 21.8% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clyde at 18.7% compared to 17.3% in Bellingham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clyde at 41.8% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clyde at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Bellingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clyde | Bellingham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (30) | 0.5% (454) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (1,481) | 8.8% (8,220) |
| Less than High School | 11.2% (708) | 6.2% (5,781) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.3% (965) | 28.9% (27,095) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clyde vs Bellingham
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clyde and Bellingham at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clyde hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- More residents in Clyde have less than a high school education at 11.2% compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- In Bellingham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 15.3% in Clyde.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.