Demographics details for Clovis, CA vs Southaven, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clovis, CA vs Southaven, MS.
| Data | Clovis | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 124,556 | 56,360 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $98,554 | $72,513 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Clovis vs Southaven
- In Clovis, the population is higher at 124,556, compared to 56,360 in Southaven.
- The median age in Southaven is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 34.8 years in Clovis.
- Clovis has a higher median income of $98,554 compared to $72,513 in Southaven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clovis at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Southaven.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clovis and Southaven at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Clovis is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Southaven.
Demographics
Demographics Clovis vs Southaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clovis | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 35 |
| White | 38 | 55 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clovis vs Southaven
- In Southaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 3% in Clovis.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Southaven at 55% compared to 38% in Clovis.
- The Asian population is larger in Clovis at 11% compared to 1% in Southaven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clovis at 33% compared to 5% in Southaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clovis at 14% compared to 4% in Southaven.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clovis at 1% compared to 0% in Southaven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clovis | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 11.7% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clovis vs Southaven
- More residents in Clovis report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Southaven at 22.9% versus 17.7% in Clovis.
- Southaven has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 11.7% in Clovis.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clovis at 16.1% compared to 14.1% in Southaven.
- Southaven has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 32.4% in Clovis.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clovis and Southaven at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clovis | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (1,628) | 1.2% (658) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (12,758) | 15.8% (8,925) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (11,589) | 8.7% (4,879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (27,119) | 16.0% (9,035) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clovis vs Southaven
- A higher percentage of residents in Clovis have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Southaven.
- In Southaven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 10.2% in Clovis.
- More residents in Clovis have less than a high school education at 9.3% compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clovis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 16.0% in Southaven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.