Demographics details for Clovis, CA vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clovis, CA vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Clovis | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 124,556 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $98,554 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clovis vs Picayune
- In Clovis, the population is higher at 124,556, compared to 11,826 in Picayune.
- The median age in Picayune is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 34.8 years in Clovis.
- Clovis has a higher median income of $98,554 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clovis at 39.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 12% in Clovis.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clovis and Picayune at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clovis vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clovis | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 38 |
| White | 38 | 55 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 33 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clovis vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 3% in Clovis.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Picayune at 55% compared to 38% in Clovis.
- The Asian population is larger in Clovis at 11% compared to 0% in Picayune.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clovis at 33% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clovis at 14% compared to 5% in Picayune.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clovis at 1% compared to 0% in Picayune.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clovis | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 11.7% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clovis vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.7% in Clovis.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Picayune at 24.0% versus 17.7% in Clovis.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 11.7% in Clovis.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clovis at 16.1% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 32.4% in Clovis.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Clovis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clovis | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (1,628) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (12,758) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (11,589) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (27,119) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clovis vs Picayune
- A higher percentage of residents in Clovis have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- In Picayune, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 10.2% in Clovis.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Picayune at 11.8%, compared to 9.3% in Clovis.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clovis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.