Demographics details for Clovis, CA vs Clarkesville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clovis, CA vs Clarkesville, GA.
| Data | Clovis | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 124,556 | 2,112 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 47.4 years |
| Median Income | $98,554 | $64,848 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Clovis vs Clarkesville
- In Clovis, the population is higher at 124,556, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
- The median age in Clarkesville is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 34.8 years in Clovis.
- Clovis has a higher median income of $98,554 compared to $64,848 in Clarkesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clovis at 39.0% compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
- Clovis has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- The unemployment rate in Clovis is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.
Demographics
Demographics Clovis vs Clarkesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clovis | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 8 |
| White | 38 | 81 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clovis vs Clarkesville
- In Clarkesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Clovis.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarkesville at 81% compared to 38% in Clovis.
- The Asian population is larger in Clovis at 11% compared to 1% in Clarkesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clovis at 33% compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clovis at 14% compared to 6% in Clarkesville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clovis at 1% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clovis | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 11.7% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clovis vs Clarkesville
- In Clarkesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.7% in Clovis.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarkesville at 23.6% versus 17.7% in Clovis.
- Clarkesville has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 11.7% in Clovis.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Clovis.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clovis at 32.4% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarkesville at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Clovis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clovis | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (1,628) | 0.3% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (12,758) | 16.9% (356) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (11,589) | 15.2% (322) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (27,119) | 21.4% (453) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clovis vs Clarkesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Clovis have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
- In Clarkesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 10.2% in Clovis.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarkesville at 15.2%, compared to 9.3% in Clovis.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clovis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 21.4% in Clarkesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.