Demographics details for Clovis, CA vs Bellingham, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clovis, CA vs Bellingham, WA.
Data | Clovis | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
Population | 124,556 | 93,896 |
Median Age | 34.8 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $98,554 | $64,026 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clovis vs Bellingham
- In Clovis, the population is higher at 124,556, compared to 93,896 in Bellingham.
- Residents in Clovis have a higher median age of 34.8 years compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Clovis has a higher median income of $98,554 compared to $64,026 in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clovis at 39.0% compared to 32.0% in Bellingham.
- Clovis has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Bellingham.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clovis and Bellingham at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clovis vs Bellingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clovis | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 38 | 74 |
Asian | 11 | 6 |
Hispanic | 33 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clovis vs Bellingham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clovis at 3% compared to 1% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bellingham at 74% compared to 38% in Clovis.
- The Asian population is larger in Clovis at 11% compared to 6% in Bellingham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clovis at 33% compared to 10% in Bellingham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clovis at 14% compared to 8% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clovis and Bellingham at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clovis | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.9% |
Depression | 17.7% | 30.0% |
Smoking | 11.7% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clovis vs Bellingham
- In Bellingham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.7% in Clovis.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bellingham at 30.0% versus 17.7% in Clovis.
- Bellingham has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 11.7% in Clovis.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bellingham at 17.3% compared to 16.1% in Clovis.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clovis at 32.4% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bellingham at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Clovis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clovis | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (1,628) | 0.5% (454) |
High School Diploma | 10.2% (12,758) | 8.8% (8,220) |
Less than High School | 9.3% (11,589) | 6.2% (5,781) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (27,119) | 28.9% (27,095) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clovis vs Bellingham
- A higher percentage of residents in Clovis have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clovis hold a high school diploma at 10.2% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- More residents in Clovis have less than a high school education at 9.3% compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- In Bellingham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 21.8% in Clovis.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.