Demographics details for Clovis, CA vs Beecher city, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clovis, CA vs Beecher city, IL.

Data Clovis Beecher city
Population 124,556 423
Median Age 34.8 years 36.9 years
Median Income $98,554 $39,297
Married Families 39.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 12% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Clovis vs Beecher city

  • In Clovis, the population is higher at 124,556, compared to 423 in Beecher city.
  • The median age in Beecher city is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 34.8 years in Clovis.
  • Clovis has a higher median income of $98,554 compared to $39,297 in Beecher city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clovis at 39.0% compared to 27.0% in Beecher city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Beecher city at 14%, compared to 12% in Clovis.
  • The unemployment rate in Clovis is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Beecher city.

Demographics

Demographics Clovis vs Beecher city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clovis Beecher city
Black 3 Data is updating
White 38 99
Asian 11 Data is updating
Hispanic 33 Data is updating
Two or More Races 14 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clovis vs Beecher city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clovis at 3% compared to 0% in Beecher city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Beecher city at 99% compared to 38% in Clovis.
  • The Asian population is larger in Clovis at 11% compared to 0% in Beecher city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clovis at 33% compared to 0% in Beecher city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clovis at 14% compared to 1% in Beecher city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clovis at 1% compared to 0% in Beecher city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clovis Beecher city
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 9.6%
Depression 17.7% 21.4%
Smoking 11.7% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 18.8%
Obesity 32.4% 34.0%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clovis vs Beecher city

  • More residents in Clovis report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.2% in Beecher city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Beecher city at 21.4% versus 17.7% in Clovis.
  • Beecher city has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 11.7% in Clovis.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beecher city at 18.8% compared to 16.1% in Clovis.
  • Beecher city has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 32.4% in Clovis.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beecher city at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Clovis.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clovis Beecher city
No Schooling 1.3% (1,628) 0.7% (3)
High School Diploma 10.2% (12,758) 23.6% (100)
Less than High School 9.3% (11,589) 17.5% (74)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.8% (27,119) 7.1% (30)

Education Levels Comparison: Clovis vs Beecher city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Clovis have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Beecher city.
  • In Beecher city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.6% compared to 10.2% in Clovis.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beecher city at 17.5%, compared to 9.3% in Clovis.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clovis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 7.1% in Beecher city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.