Demographics details for Clinton, SC vs Waynesboro, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, SC vs Waynesboro, MS.
| Data | Clinton | Waynesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,554 | 4,530 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $38,350 | $24,779 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 32% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Waynesboro
- In Clinton, the population is higher at 7,554, compared to 4,530 in Waynesboro.
- The median age in Waynesboro is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher median income of $38,350 compared to $24,779 in Waynesboro.
- In Waynesboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Waynesboro at 32%, compared to 18% in Clinton.
- Waynesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Waynesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clinton | Waynesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 56 |
| White | 55 | 39 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Waynesboro
- In Waynesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 38% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 39% in Waynesboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Clinton at 2% compared to 0% in Waynesboro.
- Waynesboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clinton at 4% compared to 0% in Waynesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clinton and Waynesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clinton | Waynesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 21.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 17.9% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 29.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 10.9% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 49.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Waynesboro
- In Waynesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 19.1% in Clinton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clinton at 23.7% compared to 23.4% in Waynesboro.
- Waynesboro has a higher smoking rate at 29.6% compared to 22.0% in Clinton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 10.9% in Waynesboro.
- Waynesboro has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 44.9% in Clinton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waynesboro at 36.0% compared to 17.0% in Clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clinton | Waynesboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (74) | 3.7% (169) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,460) | 18.2% (826) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (1,177) | 23.4% (1,061) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,310) | 15.0% (679) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Waynesboro
- In Waynesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 18.2% in Waynesboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waynesboro at 23.4%, compared to 15.6% in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 15.0% in Waynesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.