Demographics details for Clinton, SC vs Sun city west, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, SC vs Sun city west, AZ.
Data | Clinton | Sun city west |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,554 | 26,639 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 74.8 years |
Median Income | $38,350 | $61,941 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 67.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Sun city west
- The population in Sun city west is higher at 26,639, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- The median age in Sun city west is higher at 74.8 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Sun city west has a higher median income of $61,941, compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- In Sun city west, the percentage of married families is higher at 67.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 7% in Sun city west.
- The unemployment rate in Clinton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Sun city west.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Sun city west provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clinton | Sun city west |
---|---|---|
Black | 38 | 1 |
White | 55 | 96 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Sun city west
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clinton at 38% compared to 1% in Sun city west.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sun city west at 96% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clinton at 2% compared to 1% in Sun city west.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Clinton and Sun city west at 1%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clinton at 4% compared to 1% in Sun city west.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clinton and Sun city west at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clinton | Sun city west |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 9.4% |
Depression | 23.7% | 20.2% |
Smoking | 22.0% | 13.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 44.9% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Sun city west
- More residents in Clinton report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.5% in Sun city west.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clinton at 23.7% compared to 20.2% in Sun city west.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clinton at 22.0% compared to 13.8% in Sun city west.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sun city west at 19.7% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clinton at 44.9% compared to 28.6% in Sun city west.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sun city west at 25.0% compared to 17.0% in Clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clinton | Sun city west |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (74) | 0.4% (110) |
High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,460) | 23.7% (6,308) |
Less than High School | 15.6% (1,177) | 6.2% (1,656) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,310) | 34.7% (9,240) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Sun city west
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Sun city west.
- In Sun city west, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 19.3% in Clinton.
- More residents in Clinton have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 6.2% in Sun city west.
- In Sun city west, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 17.3% in Clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.