Demographics details for Clinton, SC vs Sioux city, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, SC vs Sioux city, IA.
Data | Clinton | Sioux city |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,554 | 85,497 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 34.8 years |
Median Income | $38,350 | $64,250 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Sioux city
- The population in Sioux city is higher at 85,497, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- Residents in Clinton have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 34.8 years in Sioux city.
- Sioux city has a higher median income of $64,250, compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- In Sioux city, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Sioux city.
- The unemployment rate in Clinton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.9% in Sioux city.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Sioux city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clinton | Sioux city |
---|---|---|
Black | 38 | 5 |
White | 55 | 56 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 1 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Sioux city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clinton at 38% compared to 5% in Sioux city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sioux city at 56% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- In Sioux city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Clinton.
- Sioux city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 1% in Clinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sioux city at 13%, compared to 4% in Clinton.
- In Sioux city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Clinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clinton | Sioux city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 11.3% |
Depression | 23.7% | 20.0% |
Smoking | 22.0% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 20.9% |
Obesity | 44.9% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Sioux city
- More residents in Clinton report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.0% in Sioux city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clinton at 23.7% compared to 20.0% in Sioux city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clinton at 22.0% compared to 20.1% in Sioux city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sioux city at 20.9% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clinton at 44.9% compared to 38.6% in Sioux city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Sioux city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clinton | Sioux city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (74) | 1.3% (1,129) |
High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,460) | 17.3% (14,795) |
Less than High School | 15.6% (1,177) | 16.1% (13,764) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,310) | 14.1% (12,061) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Sioux city
- In Sioux city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 17.3% in Sioux city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sioux city at 16.1%, compared to 15.6% in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 14.1% in Sioux city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.