Demographics details for Clinton, SC vs Madison heights, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, SC vs Madison heights, VA.
| Data | Clinton | Madison heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,554 | 10,694 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $38,350 | $59,570 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Madison heights
- The population in Madison heights is higher at 10,694, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- The median age in Madison heights is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Madison heights has a higher median income of $59,570, compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- In Madison heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Madison heights.
- The unemployment rate in Clinton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Madison heights.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Madison heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clinton | Madison heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 23 |
| White | 55 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Madison heights
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clinton at 38% compared to 23% in Madison heights.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Madison heights at 71% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clinton at 2% compared to 0% in Madison heights.
- Madison heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clinton at 4% compared to 3% in Madison heights.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clinton and Madison heights at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clinton | Madison heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Madison heights
- More residents in Clinton report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.3% in Madison heights.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Madison heights at 24.7% versus 23.7% in Clinton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clinton at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Madison heights.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Madison heights at 17.3% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clinton at 44.9% compared to 36.8% in Madison heights.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Madison heights at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clinton | Madison heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (74) | 1.6% (171) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,460) | 20.6% (2,206) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (1,177) | 16.4% (1,753) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,310) | 11.3% (1,207) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Madison heights
- In Madison heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- In Madison heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.6% compared to 19.3% in Clinton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Madison heights at 16.4%, compared to 15.6% in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 11.3% in Madison heights.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.