Demographics details for Clinton, SC vs Jesup, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, SC vs Jesup, IA.
| Data | Clinton | Jesup |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,554 | 2,525 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 33.0 years |
| Median Income | $38,350 | $83,519 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Jesup
- In Clinton, the population is higher at 7,554, compared to 2,525 in Jesup.
- Residents in Clinton have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 33.0 years in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher median income of $83,519, compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- In Jesup, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Jesup.
- The unemployment rate in Clinton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Jesup.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Jesup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clinton | Jesup |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 55 | 97 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Jesup
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clinton at 38% compared to 0% in Jesup.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jesup at 97% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clinton at 2% compared to 0% in Jesup.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Clinton and Jesup at 1%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clinton at 4% compared to 2% in Jesup.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clinton and Jesup at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clinton | Jesup |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 18.0% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 24.2% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Jesup
- More residents in Clinton report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.1% in Jesup.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clinton at 23.7% compared to 18.0% in Jesup.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clinton at 22.0% compared to 16.7% in Jesup.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jesup at 24.2% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clinton at 44.9% compared to 34.8% in Jesup.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Jesup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clinton | Jesup |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (74) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,460) | 15.4% (389) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (1,177) | 5.2% (132) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,310) | 12.1% (306) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Jesup
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Jesup.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 15.4% in Jesup.
- More residents in Clinton have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 5.2% in Jesup.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 12.1% in Jesup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.